新闻摘要：
近日网络上对中国科学院 2025 年院士增选的讨论集中在几位候选人的学术问题上。帖文指出，曾木圣和耿美玉等人有论文图片重复、替换或更正的记录，其中部分论文曾被撤回或更改，相关指控涉及学术不端和以身份帮亲属推进学术成果的说法；同时有网友把耿美玉的工作与争议药品“九期一”的研究及停产情况联系在一起。原帖以知乎问答形式呈现，引用了撤稿说明、PubPeer 评论和相关文献作为佐证。
这些信息提醒公众与学术界关注增选过程的透明度和审查机制，以及个人诚信对科研体系与公众信任的影响。院士作为学术标杆，其行事和研究记录容易被放大，如何在尊重程序与实事求是之间保持平衡，是这次讨论留下的现实课题。
思考与启发：
日常生活中无论职位高低，诚信都是最基本的底线。科研和评审不是孤立的象牙塔，它与病患、消费者以及整个社会的信任紧密相连；守住诚信，才能让工作经得起时间和公众的检验。面对争议，既需要冷静的调查与程序正义，也需要每个人在自己岗位上守好本分。
在这个层面上，天经提醒我们的根本是正直与谨慎：做人要诚实，做事要负责任。把这份朴素的要求放在日常里，既是对职业的尊重，也是对他人的善待。
经文：
正直人的纯正引导自己，奸诈人的乖僻灭亡他们。《宰逋尔·箴言 11:3》
链接：📖 查看经文
### English Translation
TitleA Test of Academic Honesty
News Summary
Recently, online discussions about the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ 2025 election of new academicians have focused on the scholarly records of several candidates. Posts point out that candidates such as Zeng Musheng and Geng Meiyu have been linked to papers that contain duplicated, swapped, or later‑corrected images. Some of those papers were eventually retracted or corrected, and the accusations include research misconduct and claims that the candidates used their status to help family members publish. In addition, some users have connected Geng Meiyu’s work to the controversial drug “Phase‑9‑One” and its recent halt in production. The original post was written as a Zhihu (Chinese Quora‑style) Q&A and cited retraction notices, PubPeer comments, and the relevant papers as evidence.
The information serves as a reminder that the public and the scientific community should watch the election process closely, demanding transparency and solid review procedures. An academician is meant to be a role model; therefore, their conduct and research history are under strong scrutiny. The current debate raises a real‑world question: how can we balance respect for due process with a commitment to truth and integrity?
Thoughts and Take‑aways
Integrity is the basic floor for any role, no matter how high or low the position. Science and peer review are not isolated ivory‑tower activities—they affect patients, consumers, and the wider society’s trust. Guarding honesty allows our work to stand the test of time and public scrutiny. When controversies arise, we need calm, thorough investigations and fair procedures, and we also need each of us to do our part responsibly in our own jobs.
At its core, the message is simple: be honest and act responsibly. Living out this plain requirement each day shows respect for our professions and kindness toward others.
Scripture
“The integrity of the upright guides them, but the crookedness of the treacherous destroys them.” – Proverbs 11:3
Link
📖 Read the Scripture Passage (opens in a new tab)
来源：https://www.zhihu.com/question/1975130863109939634
